Donald Sterling And The First Amendment

Written by  Cedric Hopkins August 06, 2014
Tweet This!

Much has been said about Donald Sterling’s racist comments and now Mark Cuban’s follow-up to Sterling’s wake. It appears the principle dispute with these comments, particularly Sterling’s comments, is his right to free speech. While the concern for free speech is understandable, it’s misplaced.

Most cite Sterling’s right to free speech as the foundation for their argument that Sterling shouldn’t be forced to sell the L.A. Clippers.

Despite popular opinion, Sterling being forced out of the NBA has nothing to do with free speech.

The United States Constitution provides us with the right to free speech and only applies to (or can be used to defend against) state action. State action comes from state actors, who receive their paychecks from the government, either city, county, state or federal. In other words, think along the lines of police officers, courts, public schools, etc.

The NBA is not a state actor—the owners of the respective NBA teams, not Obama, ink the signatures on the players’ paychecks. Consequently, Sterling can’t hold up the Constitution in defense of the actions being taken against him by the NBA.

Sterling signed up to be a part of a private group of NBA owners who set their own rules, which they are entitled to do under the law. The government has no say over the terms of that agreement—it’s a private agreement and he has to abide by that agreement or endure the consequences of not doing so.

The private agreement dictates the consequences Sterling will endure.

Bottom line: private acts of discrimination cannot be addressed under the First Amendment. So the only way the First Amendment would come into play with Sterling’s case is if the government owned the NBA, which, in that case, the league would be operating in a deficit in no time.

Cedric Hopkins

Cedric Hopkins Bio

Cedric Hopkins runs this sports law/fantasy football blog. If you have issues with it, it's all his fault. Cedric was an athlete-student at the University of New Mexico (Basketball - Go Lobos!). He then morphed into a student-athlete when he attended law school in San Diego. Age replaced athleticism and now he writes appellate briefs for criminals (alleged criminals, of course) in state and federal cases, including writing U.S. Supreme Court briefs.

For years Cedric has researched and written about legal issues but maintained a love for sports. With, he's combining his two passions: researching and writing about sports. When he's not in court arguing a case before a judge (or writing about himself in the third person), he'll be doing the same with his articles on Follow me, er, him on Twitter (opens in a new window).

Other articles from Cedric Hopkins

back to top